Edinburgh Unit for Forensic Anthropology
RESEARCH GROUP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH
VILLAINS VICTIMS AND FORENSIC EVIDENCE II
March 16th, 2015, Archaeology, University of Edinburgh
Meadows lecture Theatre, Old medical School, Teviot Place
Program
17:10: Death in west Texas: Forensic Anthropology Casework.
Prof. Robert R. Paine,
Texas Tech University, Department of Soc., Anthropology and SW Lubbock, TX 79409
17:00: Event opening and introduction of the speakers - Dr. Elena Kranioti
During the last 18 years of working in the Lubbock area a number of unusual and interesting forensic anthropological cases have emerged. Several of these cases gained international attention (e.g. “Suit case killer”, “State School murders”). During this presentation I will recount the circumstances specific to case work. Included in this talk will be a brief bio-history of the victims, the recovery process of the remains, an anthropological analysis for each case and the legal outcome. In doing so, a discussion specific to age and sex assessment and the other basic methods used by anthropologists to resolve the identification of human decomposed remains will be offered. Additionally, comments and observations related to trauma associated with homicidal death events will also be provided. In the end, my intention is to educate the audience so that they will have a great appreciation for the role played by anthropologists in the team effort in solving difficult cases involving human skeletal material.
18:00: Title: Age at death estimation based on bone biomechanical properties
Dr Peter Zioupos
Centre for Musculoskeletal & Medicolegal research, Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Shrivenham SN6 8LA, UK
The word ‘bone’ refers both to a formed structure and to the material of which it is made. Bone material is highly metabolically active and at any point in time it offers a record of whom it belongs to and what past history it has been subjected to in terms of loading, disease, diet and environmental influences. Analysis of cross sections of cortical bone from the mid-thigh have revealed that certain physico-chemical and mechanical characteristics of bone -as a material- can be linked to the age of the subject. We have developed a technique which can reverse this process so as to predict ‘age at death’ by using a set of laboratory based analytical tests. The analysis requires uses small amount of tissue, as may be the case in dismembered bodies or where the corpses have sustained excessive damage or fragmentation. Age is one of the four important attributes that a forensic anthropologist is called to answer together with sex, stature and ethnic background, and as such it is very important for identification purposes. Current anthropological methods often are unable to determined age better than saying a “mature adult” and other examination of skeletal features offers accuracy no better than ±15 years. The present method uses constitutional and/or heterogeneity related changes in the inner structure and properties of the bone matrix and its elements to produce through a series of algorithms prediction values for the age of the individual, which are in most cases within ±3 years of the actual values.
Dr Peter Zioupos' academic profile can be found here
18:45 Title: The Heretability of Facial Morphology: Preliminary results
Helen Langstaff, PhD Candidate
Edinburgh Unit For Forensic Anthropology, SHCA, University of Edinburgh, EH89AG, Edinburgh, UK
Facial characteristics are the features we use every day to identify people. Unlike fingerprints which are individual even to identical twins, there are many features of our faces which we believe to be inherited from our parents. So does saying often repeated at the sight of a baby ‘Doesn’t he/she have their fathers/mothers nose’ have anything in it? There are many families where it is obvious that there related just by looking at their faces but there are just as many where one or all of the offspring show no similarity to the other family members. The understanding of similarities within family members is mostly based on visual observations thus being a subjective way to make a judgment. Looking at two faces one can simply say that there is "some" resemblance or not but we can't actually say "how similar" the faces actually are. The proposed study aspires to address this issue by proposing a method of quantification of facial shapes between family members in order to explore the actual correlation between hereditary traits.